• STORE
  • EVENTS
  • ARTICLES
  • DECKS
  • BUYLIST
  • HELP
  • GAME CENTER
  • NEWSLETTER
Advanced Search
Deck Builder
  • LOGIN /
     REGISTER
  • CART
    #
  • WISH
    LIST
  • Magic Singles
    • English
    • Foil English
    • Non-English
    • Foil Non-English
    • Scanned & Graded Cards
    • Rarities & Misprints
    • Wholesale Lots
  • Magic Sealed Product
    • Booster Boxes
    • Booster Packs
    • Box Sets
    • Bundles & Fat Packs
    • Duel Decks
    • Introductory Products
    • Multiplayer Products
    • Non-English Products
    • Tournament/Starter Packs
  • Gaming Supplies
    • Ultimate Guard®
    • Apparel & Accessories
    • Binders
    • Books
    • Collectibles
    • Deck Boxes & Cases
    • Life Counters & Dice
    • Playmats
    • Sleeves
  • Specialty Items
    • Creature Collection
    • Gift Cards
    • Lithographs
    • Next Level Library
  • Digital Products
    • Complete Commander
    • Next Level Library
    • OMG: Official Miser's Guide
    • Tha Gatherin'
  • We Buy

Who's The Beatdown?

Mike Flores
1/01/99
  •  


Editor's Note: A long time ago, the first Magic website was The Dojo - a site that is still legendary for publishing some of the most fundamental principles of Magic. Almost all strategical theory can be traced back to the Dojo's loyal writers, and any serious Magic player owes these old vets a debt of gratitude.

Unfortunately, thanks to financial troubles, The Dojo went out of business in 2000. In a last-ditch effort to save the four years of wisdom that had been collected there at the time, the editor asked the community to archive the articles for future reference. The best of the Dojo articles are reprinted here because they're still vital to Magic today... StarCityGames.com merely reprints them, adding links to clarify older cards that new players probably won't have seen so that they can understand some of the strategy. Many of the Dojo's writers are still active in Magic and write for other sites; give them a shout-out for helping the community grow.


Who's The Beatdown?

The most common (yet subtle, yet disastrous) mistake I see in tournament Magic is the misassignment of who is the beatdown deck and who is the control deck in a similar deck vs. similar deck matchup. The player who misassigns himself is inevitably the loser.

You see, in similar deck vs. similar deck matchups, unless the decks are really symmetrical (i.e. the true Mirror match), one deck has to play the role of beatdown, and the other deck has to play the role of control. This can be a very serious dilemma, if, say, both are playing aggressive decks.

Let me give you an example: At a 1.x PTQ in Washington D. C., my teammate Al Tran was playing for a top 8 slot vs. Sligh. Al was playing Lan D. Ho's White weenie/Jank deck, normally an aggressive deck... But not vs. Sligh.

The match was split 1-1, and the third game was going to determine who made top 8.

Al's opponent went first and laid a Jackal Pup. At this point, Al had two Cursed Scrolls, two Swords to Plowshares, an Honorable Passage, and some land in hand. Al chose not to Plow the Jackal Pup, taking 2 on the first attack.

His opponent played another Pup. Al didn't Plow either, waiting on Scroll mana or a Lightning Bolt.

On his own second turn, Al played another land and a Cursed Scroll, so he only had one land up.

On his opponent's third turn, you guessed it, another Mountain came down, followed by Ball Lightning. Al was forced to Plow the Ball. He gained control over the next few turns, but ended up dying to Bolts.

What was the problem here? Al was a beatdown deck, and he wanted to deal damage to his opponent via the Jackal Pups. However, in this particular matchup, he had to play the control deck. You see, Sligh is just much faster than Jank, so Jank's way to win has to be stifling Sligh's early speed with removal, and then locking down the midgame with Cursed Scrolls. Because Sligh also has Cursed Scrolls, as well as more Bolts than Jank, the only way that Jank can win is to make sure it has a decent life total as it plays its own threat cards.

Though it ostensibly hurts the initial race to give the Sligh player four additional life from the Jackal Pups, you can see from this example that Al had to give him six more life from the Ball Lightning... And still took at least eight from the Pups before he could control them. It would have profited Al much more to Plow the Pups, Passage the Ball, and enter the midgame with twenty life as he started to threaten with his own Paladins, Priests, etc.

The same comparison can be made when two control-based decks slug it out. At the same PTQ, I was playing High Tide against what is normally a dangerous matchup for me, CounterSliver. My opponent was running the usual array of Slivers, Worship, and permission, as well as Cursed Scroll. He made the mistake of thinking he was the control deck.

After playing a turn-2 Crystalline Sliver, he followed up two turns later with Worship, so I Stroked him out. (I killed him the first game with Palinchron, and because I mostly showed him some Disrupts, Force Spikes, and card drawing, he may have thought I was more creature heavy).

It doesn't matter... He thought he was the control deck in this matchup when clearly I was the control deck. I had a comparable or greater amount of permission, but where he had Slivers, I had card drawing and deck manipulation; where he had dual lands, I had Thawing Glaciers. My Thaws were going to insure that I never missed a land drop. I had already housed a couple of his Brainstorms with Disrupt. This means that I was going to win the long game every single time.

His job, therefore, was to kill me before I killed him. The normal formula is to play some decent-sized Slivers (two power or more) attacking every turn and leaving mana open to try to counter whatever the opposing blue deck does that might be threatening (you know, a Wrath of God, an Engineered Plague, or in this case the High Tide finishing combo). First of all, he probably should have tried to threaten me more aggressively: only one Crystalline gives me a lot of turns of Thawing and card-drawing. Secondly, tapping out is the death knell: I didn't even have to waste a Turnabout on him.

In similar deck vs. similar deck matchups, there are a couple of things that you want to look at to figure out what role to play:

  1. 1. Who has more damage? Usually he has to be the beatdown deck.
  2. 2. Who has more removal? Usually he has to be the control deck.
  3. 3. Who has more permission and card drawing? Almost always he has to be the control deck.

If you are the beatdown deck, you have to kill your opponent faster than he can kill you. If you are the control deck, you have to weather the early beatdown and get into a position where you can gain card advantage.

For an example of correctly determining who is the beatdown deck and who is the control deck, look at the Sligh vs. Sligh match between Price and Pacifico at the top 8 of the 1998 U.S. Nationals. Although on the surface, the two players seem to be playing very similar decks, there are major design differences:

Dave's deck was running more Cursed Scrolls than Pacifico's, and he also had Hammer of Bogardan and Fireslinger. His only real beatdown was Jackal Pup and Ball Lightning - the rest of the deck was more control and utility oriented.

Pacifico's deck was much more damage-oriented... It was based around attacking and celerity creatures instead of dedicated removal. In addition to Jackal Pup and Ball Lightning, he had Goblin Vandal, Mogg Flunkies, Suq'ata Lancer, and Viashino Sandstalker. Furthermore, Pacifico's deck lacked Fireslinger and Hammer of Bogardan, and ran only three Cursed Scrolls.

While Dave's deck could definitely get a quick start, in this matchup, his deck was the control deck, set up for the long game. In one duel, Dave just played land and Scrolls and did very little else. He started by removing Pacifico's creatures with blocks or Bolts, and then Scroll-locked him, gained a little card advantage, and finished the game.

Had Dave tried to race Pacifico, he might not have won. When two players are just blindly throwing their creatures into one another, the one with more damage-oriented cards is going to win the race (but I figure we expect good Sligh play from the King of Red).

Finally, think about the Suicide Black vs. Sligh matchup. These are both very fast beatdown decks. Sligh invariably wins.

Which deck has more damage? Suicide Black. It runs many high power-to-cost creatures, like Carnophage, Sarcomancy, and sometimes Flesh Reaver. Sometimes it has stuff like Hatred. It damages even itself.

Which deck has more removal? Sligh. If Suicide Black even runs Cursed Scrolls, the Sligh deck can invariably match them. Moreover, the Sligh deck has not just weenies, but Bolts.

Though Sligh is very fast (goldfish around turn 4), Suicide Black can goldfish on turn 2 or 3 depending on the version and the Ritual draw. Clearly, the Suicide Black deck has to be the beatdown deck and the Sligh deck has to be the control deck. However, Suicide Black can't afford to be the beatdown deck. It can't lay many of its clocks, especially Sarcomancy or Flesh Reaver, because the Sligh deck has so many bolts. It can almost never cast a Hatred, for fear of auto-loss to an Incinerate. So if it can't really beat down, the Suicide Black deck has to try to be the control deck.

Anyone who has ever witnessed this matchup (at least when the Sligh deck gets a decent draw) knows how well control-oriented Suicide Black turns out.

Misassignment of Role = Game Loss.

After sideboarding, the Suicide Black deck has traditionally done much better. By taking out a lot of its"damage myself" cards for creature removal and life gaining, it can play the control role more adequately, and has a much improved (if not great) chance of winning.

Mike Flores
Cabal Rogue
Team Discovery Channel
madmanpoet@yahoo.com

  •  
« Previous Article
Clear The Land And The Fundamental Turn
Next Article »
The Daily Shot: The Onslaught White Set Review, A - G

About Mike Flores

Mike has written for The Duelist, The Sideboard, and MagicTheGathering.com and has returned to StarCityGames.com to continue his legacy. He is a championship deck designer and Magic theory pioneer.

@fivewithflores Twitter
Read more by Mike Flores

Regional Championships
ORGANIZED PLAY
  • THIS WEEK
  • NEXT WEEK
  • +
  • THIS Saturday, February 16
  • IQ Bernardsville, NJ - The Bearded Dragon
  • IQ Denton, TX - More Fun Game Center
  • IQ Findlay, OH - Post Board Gaming
  • IQ Toronto, ON - Hairy Tarantula
  • THIS Sunday, February 17
  • IQ+ Frankenmuth, MI - The Stadium
  • IQ Williamsport, PA - The White Knight's Game Room
  • Saturday, February 23
  • IQ Alexandria, MN - Elemental Games LLP
  • IQ Clarksville, TN - Frontline Games
  • IQ Cuernavaca, MX - Yellow Rabbit
  • IQ Enfield, CT - Most Excellent Gaming
  • IQ Freehold, NJ - Nova Games
  • IQ Roanoke, VA - Star City Game Center
  • Sunday, February 24
  • IQ Adelaide, AU - Good Games Adelaide
  • IQ Cary, NC - East Coast Gaming
  • IQ+ Ciudad de Mexico, CDMX - Gamesmart
  • IQ+ New Holland, PA - Six Feet Under Games

  • Complete SCG Tour® Schedule | Coverage Archive
Leaderboard
Season One SCG Points
1 Abe Corrigan 64
2 Dominic Harvey 58
3 Tariq Patel 54
4 Jonathan Hobbs 52
5 Ethan Gaieski 47
6 Ross Merriam 43
7 Matt Tumavitch 40
8 Alex Hon 39
9 Andrew L Davis 36
10 Edgar Magalhaes 36
11 Frank Skarren 36
12 Evan Whitehouse 35
13 Dylan Donegan 35
14 Drake Sasser 35
15 Kazu Negri 32
16 Danny Jessup 31
DECKLISTS
  • STANDARD
  • MODERN
  • LEGACY
  • 2/10 SCG Classic Dallas, US
  • 2/09 SCG Open Dallas, US
  • 2/03 SCG Classic Baltimore, US
  • 2/02 Invi Qualifier Fall River, US
  • 2/02 Invi Qualifier Duluth, US
  • 2/02 Invi Qualifier Niles, US
  • 2/02 SCG Team Open Baltimore, US
  • 1/27 SCG Classic Indianapolis, US
  • 1/26 SCG Open Indianapolis, US
  • 1/12 Invi Qualifier Abingdon, US
  • 1/06 SCG Classic Columbus, US
  • 12/15 Invi Qualifier Denton, US
  • 12/14 World Magic Cup Barcelona, ES
  • 12/07 SCG Invitational Roanoke, US
  • 12/02 SCG Classic Baltimore,
  • 12/01 Invi Qualifier Kingsport, US
  • 12/01 Grand Prix Shizuoka, JP
  • 11/18 SCG Classic Las Vegas, US
  • 11/17 Invi Qualifier Pensacola, US
  • 11/17 Grand Prix Milwaukee, US
View More Standard Decks - Search Decklists
  • 2/10 Invi Qualifier Glassboro, US
  • 2/10 Invi Qualifier Newington, US
  • 2/10 SCG Classic Dallas, US
  • 2/09 Invi Qualifier Woodbridge, US
  • 2/09 Grand Prix Toronto, CA
  • 2/09 Invi Qualifier Kingsport, US
  • 2/09 Invi Qualifier Columbia, US
  • 2/03 SCG Classic Baltimore, US
  • 2/02 Invi Qualifier Lexington, US
  • 2/02 Invi Qualifier Pensacola, US
  • 2/02 Invi Qualifier Norman, US
  • 2/02 Invi Qualifier Columbus, US
  • 2/02 Invi Qualifier Little Rock, US
  • 2/02 SCG Team Open Baltimore, US
  • 1/27 Invi Qualifier Cary, US
  • 1/27 SCG Classic Indianapolis, US
  • 1/26 Invi Qualifier Toronto, CA
  • 1/13 Invi Qualifier New Holland, US
  • 1/13 SCG Classic Worcester, US
  • 1/12 Invi Qualifier Durham, US
View More Modern Decks - Search Decklists
  • 2/03 SCG Classic Baltimore, US
  • 2/02 SCG Team Open Baltimore, US
  • 1/13 SCG Classic Worcester, US
  • 1/06 SCG Classic Columbus, US
  • 11/30 Grand Prix Shizuoka, JP
  • 11/18 SCG Classic Las Vegas, US
  • 11/17 SCG Team Open Las Vegas, US
  • 10/07 SCG Classic Columbus, US
  • 10/06 SCG Team Open Columbus, US
  • 9/23 SCG Classic Baltimore, US
  • 9/22 SCG Open Baltimore, US
  • 9/16 SCG Classic Syracuse, US
  • 8/31 Grand Prix Richmond, US
  • 8/19 SCG Classic Dallas, US
  • 8/18 SCG Team Open Dallas, US
  • 8/03 Pro Tour Minneapolis, US
  • 7/22 SCG Classic Philadelphia, US
  • 7/21 SCG Team Open Philadelphia, US
  • 7/15 SCG Classic Worcester, US
  • 7/14 SCG Team Open Worcester, US
View More Legacy Decks - Search Decklists

 

Connect with us

Subscribe to our Newsletter!

Need help?
Contact Us
Help Center
Organized Play
SCG Tour
Schedule
Leaderboard
Coverage
Coverage Archives
In-Store Programs
Invitational Qualifiers
Game Night
Prerelease Playmats
Organizers
StarCityGames.com
About Us
Careers
Game Center

5728 Williamson Road NW

Roanoke, VA 24012

© 2018 StarCityGames.com®
Terms & Conditions | Privacy Statement | Refund & Return Policy