Please hold while we load your cart...
[SCROLL DOWN TO READ THE ARTICLE!]
Become a StarCityGames.com Premium Member and receive exclusive access to top-level strategies, new decklists and entertaining reports from many of the best players and writers that the game has to offer! This includes "The Innovator" & Worlds finalist Patrick Chapin, 2010 Player of the Year Brad Nelson, Classic Theorist Mike Flores, Hall of Famer Brian Kibler, GP and SCG Invitational Champion Gerry Thompson, StarCityGames.com Director of Sales Ben Bleiweiss ...and many, many more!
PLUS! StarCityGames.com Premium members now have an EXCLUSIVE WEEKLY NEWSLETTER sent just to them with the latest tech, exclusive content and exclusive deals along with unprecedented access into America's largest Magic: the Gathering sales database, and can view lists of StarCityGames.com's top-selling items - broken down by category, format legality, and rarity - in real time! When it comes to trading, increased knowledge equals increased profits - and increased knowledge is just one click away for our Premium members!
A StarCityGames.com Premium Membership gives you exclusive access to the best Magic: the Gathering content available and is an amazing bargain for just pennies a day! When you're ready to start getting more out of this game, click here to join StarCityGames.com Premium today!
If you are a valid StarCityGames.com Premium member and still cannot view the article, please consult this FAQ.
There is a pretty big difference between building a Sealed deck for a PTQ (or a Grand Prix with 0-1 byes) and a Sealed deck for a Grand Prix at which you have three byes. Because of this difference, there is a pretty big disconnect between the Sealed deck advice that many pros offer and the Sealed deck advice that many top PTQ players offer. The reason for this isn't that either the PTQ players or the pro players are necessarily wrong in how they would build their decks, it is just that the objectives that each of these types of players need to reach are very different.
For a player at a GP with three byes you are looking for an x-2 or better... this ranges from 2-2 or 3-2 (in played matches) at some of the smaller APAC GPs to 4-2 at most American and European GPs. At GP: Daytona Beach, I'd be pretty happy if I went 4-2 Day 1, successfully making it to the draft day and insuring myself some money and, at the very least, a Pro Point. Whereas if I started 4-2 at a 100+ person PTQ I'd be pretty disappointed with my finish, as that would put me out of Top 8 contention and in a position where I would need to go 1-0 or 2-0 just to win some packs.
The only result worth shooting for in the Sealed deck portion of a PTQ is a Top 8 berth (you can worry about winning the tournament once you are there). In order to achieve a Top 8 berth you will, in almost all cases, need an x-1-1 record. On your way to that record you will probably have to play against at least one player who you would consider good that has a weak but consistent, or powerful but inconsistent, deck, at least one player that you consider good with a good deck, and at least a couple of players with decks that you consider good or even great. So, in order to have a reasonable shot to make the Top 8, you want to play a deck that can consistently beat weak decks, has a reasonable chance against strong decks, and has answers to as many different types of bombs as possible.
Whereas if you are building your deck for a GP in which you have three byes, you are probably much more concerned with having a consistent deck that will have a (relatively) easy road to x-2 and a decent shot at x-0 or x-1.
So what does this mean in deck construction? Well, there are certain concessions that I am willing to make in GP deck construction that I couldn't in good conscience make at a PTQ. For example, if I have a Disenchant effect available to me at a PTQ I will very frequently run it, as I don't want to get destroy by an otherwise unanswerable bomb. Whereas in a GP I will very, very, rarely consider starting a Disenchant effect under the reasoning that I am willing to accept dropping a game to uncommonly-seen bombs because I am not willing to have a dead card in a tight match against a top player. It is much easier to come back from having a dead or suboptimal card in a PTQ, as you are likely going to be able to make up that difference by playing better than, or at least as well as, your opponent. If you are up against a Tsumura, a Kurihara, or a Hoaen, it's going to be very difficult to come back from being down a card.
The difference between how I would build a deck for a PTQ and how I would build a deck for a GP might be as small as 1 or 2 cards, it might be exactly the same, or it might be radically different. It all depends on what resources are available to you.
For a GP I want a consistent, solid deck with little to no dead cards. Playing two colors with a good curve and the chance for a light splash. If I have an off-color all-purpose answer, such as Oblivion Ring, I will usually leave it in my board. I will also leave my Disenchants and other matchup-dependent cards such in the board.
For a PTQ I want answers for everything. I will almost always play a Disenchant, and I will play a matchup hoser or two if it is at all reasonable. I will usually only play two colors if my deck is very good, very bad, or contains all the answers that I need. My third color will usually only be a slight splash, but I am not opposed to playing a solidly three-color deck if I have the mana to support it. If I have an off color all-purpose answer, like Oblivion Ring, and it is at all reasonable for me to run it, I will.
Times where I would build my deck the same way for a PTQ or a GP are when my deck contains a couple of all-purpose answers such as counterspells or Oblivion Ring.
Times when I would only build my deck a couple of cards differently are when I have a good/reasonable deck with attractive, but specialized, answers/hosers. For a GP, I would leave these in the board. For a PTQ I would try as hard as I could to make room for them.
Times when I would build my deck radically differently are when I could build a consistent, good (but not great) deck with few answers to bombs, or a slightly less consistent deck with solutions to most bombs. For a GP I would play the more consistent deck. For a PTQ I would play the deck with more answers.
Let's look at the available x-0 GP decklists to see how pro players with three byes built their decks, and compare it to how non-pros with fewer byes built their decks. Decklists with sideboards are available from GP: Bangkok. Decklists with no sideboards are available from GP: Kitakyuushuu
Pros:
Paulo had three byes, and received a very good and relatively easy-to-build deck (his Blue and Black cards are far better than his other colors), and he took full advantage of this. Instead of a Sealed style deck, Paulo got to play a Draft deck. He is solid in two colors, with two counterspells, only a couple of fillers, and Shriekmaw, Cryptic Command, and Cairn Wanderer as standouts.
Tiago was also playing with three byes, and also playing a U/B deck that was more akin to a draft deck then a sealed deck. It also had two counterspells.
If I had been building this deck for a PTQ, I definitely would have taken advantage of the 3 Vivid lands that Tiago left in his sideboard to splash, at the very least, Briarhorn and the 2 Mudbutton Torchrunners (to go with the 2 Fodder Launches).
| 8-0 Day 1 Deck - GP:Kitakyuushuu Featured by Kenji Tsumura on 2007-11-18 (Lorwyn Limited) | ||
Artifacts 1 Moonglove Extract 1 Wanderer's Twig Creatures 2 Blind-Spot Giant 1 Cairn Wanderer 1 Ceaseless Searblades 1 Flamekin Spitfire 1 Ghostly Changeling 1 Hearthcage Giant 2 Lowland Oaf 2 Skeletal Changeling 1 Thundercloud Shaman 2 Warren Pilferers Instants 3 Lash Out |
Planeswalkers 1 Liliana Vess Sorceries 1 Weed Strangle Tribal Instants 1 Nameless Inversion 1 Peppersmoke Basic Lands 9 Mountain 8 Swamp | Stats: Average mana: 1.95 Average creature mana cost: 3.93 Average creature power: 2.86 Average creature toughness: 2.86 Deck Composition: Basic Lands: 42.50% Creatures: 35.00% Instants: 7.50% Tribal Instants: 5.00% Artifacts: 5.00% Planeswalkers: 2.50% Sorceries: 2.50% |
 |
 | |
| Download this deck in Apprentice format! |
Download this deck in Magic Online Text format! | |
Kenji built a great, consistent B/R deck with a lot of removal and a great curve.
Can you imagine sitting down against Kenji and spending the entire game with a useless Disenchant in your hand?
I'm sure you can... it's not that unreasonable a situation to be in, if you play in enough GPs, PTs, or MTGO queues.
Now think about how often you will win that game.
Sure, you will mulligan a certain amount of the time, but inflicting an extra mulligan on yourself is just backbreaking, especially if your opponent is very good.
Is it just a coincidence that Paulo and Taigo's decks look so similar? I don't think so. This type of deck is a recipe for success at a GP at which you have three byes. Olivier Ruel x-0ed day 1 of GP: Brisbane with a B/R deck that he wasn't that impressed with, but was very fast and very consistent. Kenji Tsumura just x-0ed Day 1 of GP: Kitakyuushuu playing an excellent B/R deck with a great curve and 3 Lash Outs. In the first three Lorwyn Limited GPs there have been four pros with three byes going undefeated, and every one of them has been playing a two-color deck without any splashes that looks almost exactly like a good draft deck.
Non-Pros:
Junya had one bye for this GP, but he got ridiculously powerful deck that he was able to pilot to an undefeated record. It features Profane Command, Garruk Wildspeaker, and a bunch of removal. If I received a card pool that was this strong I would have tried as hard as I could to keep it to two colors, as one of the few ways that I could see myself losing with a deck this good is if I had mana problems.
| 8-0 Day 1 Deck - GP:Kitakyuushuu Featured by Jun Young Park on 2007-11-18 (Lorwyn Limited) | ||
Artifacts 1 Runed Stalactite Creatures 1 Avian Changeling 1 Bog-Strider Ash 1 Changeling Hero 1 Cloudgoat Ranger 1 Elvish Branchbender 2 Leaf Gilder 1 Marsh Flitter 1 Moonglove Winnower 1 Shriekmaw 1 Skeletal Changeling 1 Vigor 1 Warren Pilferers Enchantments 1 Fertile Ground 1 Oblivion Ring Instants 1 Fistful of Force 1 Neck Snap |
Legendary Creatures 1 Nath of the Gilt-Leaf Planeswalkers 1 Garruk Wildspeaker Sorceries 1 Incremental Growth Tribal Enchantments 1 Lignify Tribal Instants 1 Nameless Inversion Basic Lands 8 Forest 4 Plains 5 Swamp | Stats: Average mana: 2.00 Average creature mana cost: 3.93 Average creature power: 2.64 Average creature toughness: 2.64 Deck Composition: Basic Lands: 42.50% Enchantments: 5.00% Creatures: 32.50% Tribal Instants: 2.50% Artifacts: 2.50% Instants: 5.00% Tribal Enchantments: 2.50% Legendary Creatures: 2.50% Planeswalkers: 2.50% Sorceries: 2.50% |
 |
 | |
| Download this deck in Apprentice format! |
Download this deck in Magic Online Text format! | |
Jun had one bye for GP: Kitakyuushuu. The mana in this deck is really rough, playing the WW Cloudgoat Ranger off four Plains and a Fertile Ground. While we can't see Jun's sideboard it is pretty clear that he chose to play all of his best cards, including a number of bombs and a wealth of answers.
| 8-0 Day 1 Deck - GP: Kitakyuushuu Featured by Hiromasa Imagawa on 2007-11-18 (Lorwyn Limited) | ||
Artifacts 1 Springleaf Drum 1 Wanderer's Twig Creatures 1 Boggart Harbinger 1 Cloudcrown Oak 2 Hornet Harasser 1 Mad Auntie 1 Marsh Flitter 1 Mudbutton Torchrunner 1 Seedguide Ash 2 Shriekmaw 1 Skeletal Changeling 2 Woodland Changeling Enchantments 1 Oblivion Ring |
Instants 1 Footbottom Feast 1 Lash Out Sorceries 1 Final Revels 1 Incremental Growth 1 Primal Command 1 Profane Command Tribal Instants 1 Gilt-Leaf Ambush Basic Lands 6 Forest 1 Mountain 1 Plains 7 Swamp Lands 1 Vivid Crag 1 Vivid Meadow | Stats: Average mana: 1.90 Average creature mana cost: 3.54 Average creature power: 2.15 Average creature toughness: 2.00 Deck Composition: Basic Lands: 37.50% Creatures: 32.50% Tribal Instants: 2.50% Sorceries: 10.00% Artifacts: 5.00% Lands: 5.00% Instants: 5.00% Enchantments: 2.50% |
 |
 | |
| Download this deck in Apprentice format! |
Download this deck in Magic Online Text format! | |
Hiromasa also had one bye for GP: Kitakyuushuu. This deck is insanely good, featuring two Shriekmaws and a Profane Command to go along with great mana, a great curve, and a ton of answers.
While the pros who x-0ed these GPs all went for consistent two-color decks, the three non-pros - Hiromasa Imagawa, Jun Young Park and Junya Iyanaga - who x-0ed Bangkok or Kitakyuushuu (the x-0 decks from GP: Brisbane Day 1 are unfortunately unavailable) all featured at least three colors, very powerful cards, and a lot of answers.
I recognize that there is a risk that I am taking too much anecdotal evidence as factual evidence. But it is clear to me that there is a difference between the types of decks that have the best success ratio for PTQs and GPs at which a player has zero or one bye, at and decks for GPs at which a player has three byes. What you have to do to consistently beat players at the PTQ level, and what you have to do to have a good chance to beat the best players in the world, is different. Often drastically different.
Take care,
Steve Sadin
PS: Junya Iyanaga is probably really good. He took the trip from Japan to Thailand to play in GP: Bangkok, for which he only had one bye. I'm not sure exactly how difficult or expensive this trip is, but Junya clearly thought it was worth it and made good on his decision, posting a Top 8 finish.
A Top 8 finish with only one bye is pretty impressive, but it would be easy for people to say things like, "He just got lucky," or "Oh, he just got a busted Sealed deck."
So he came back two weeks later and won GP: Kitakyuushuu, beating Olivier Ruel and Shouta Yasooka in the Top 8.
Watch for Junya Iyanaga... he could be the real deal.
One of the most important questions players are forced to answer during a game of Magic is “What is my role?” Mike Flores tells us that Misassignment of Role = Game Loss, and while that is certainly true, there is more to the... 
Hello and welcome to another article about those lovable Blue miscreants, the Faerie tribe. Today I’ll be going over the general matches, tips, and some... 
It turns out that given a theoretically unlimited supply of boosters, starters, and tix, the only thing stopping you playing MODO... 
One is the loneliest number that you’ll ever do… and singleton cards in Constructed Magic can seem very lonely indeed. Today’s Sullivan Library examines the theory behind including one-of cards in your ultra-honed sixty-card... 
Last week I was reading various articles on Lorwyn Limited in order to bone up for my first foray into LOR draft at FNM, so of course I checked out Nick... 
As of late I’ve notice myself slipping into a bad habit, and I don’t like it. It makes me uncomfortable. It’s a habit I see a lot of people doing from the... 
Last weekend I went from the newest format to the oldest, and back again. Both went pretty well. The old stuff: I judged the StarCityGames.com Vintage event in... 
Hello once again Magic players, and welcome to another edition of the Magic Show. This week we’re going to tackle the Finals of the 2007 Magic Invitational, a... 
Seeing how we are now two weeks away from the State Championships, we have the opportunity to examine the Standard metagame in motion. We are on our way to the World Championships in a month’s time, give or take a little, and in... 
The elusive Blue Envelope... the Holy Grail for which every PTQ player pines. How, exactly, can we put ourselves in the proper mindset to achieve a PTQ win? Is it about practice, belief, luck... all of these things? Today’s... 
When in the course of deckbuilding, sometimes you end up stepping back from your project and asking why you're even trying to make a new deck. Players get all sorts of satisfaction out of Magic, and much of that can come from... 
The Ferrett gets a sturdy card pool this time around, with a lot of bombs... And for once, he builds it correctly! (Or hey, at least correctly enough to do well... 
