Insider Trading - Autographed Cards
[SCROLL DOWN TO READ THE ARTICLE!]
Become a StarCityGames.com Premium Member and receive exclusive access to top-level strategies, new decklists and entertaining reports from many of the best players and writers that the game has to offer! This includes "The Innovator" & Worlds finalist Patrick Chapin, 2010 Player of the Year Brad Nelson, Classic Theorist Mike Flores, Hall of Famer Brian Kibler, GP and SCG Invitational Champion Gerry Thompson, StarCityGames.com Director of Sales Ben Bleiweiss ...and many, many more!
PLUS! StarCityGames.com Premium members now have an EXCLUSIVE WEEKLY NEWSLETTER sent just to them with the latest tech, exclusive content and exclusive deals along with unprecedented access into America's largest Magic: the Gathering sales database, and can view lists of StarCityGames.com's top-selling items - broken down by category, format legality, and rarity - in real time! When it comes to trading, increased knowledge equals increased profits - and increased knowledge is just one click away for our Premium members!
A StarCityGames.com Premium Membership gives you exclusive access to the best Magic: the Gathering content available and is an amazing bargain for just pennies a day! When you're ready to start getting more out of this game, click here to join StarCityGames.com Premium today!
If you are a valid StarCityGames.com Premium member and still cannot view the article, please consult this FAQ.
Hello everyone, and welcome back to Insider Trading! In today's column, I'm going to answer some questions pertaining to autographed cards. Let's start out with a question that I get pretty frequently from customers:
I have a card signed by the artist. Does that raise or lower the value of my card?
I get asked this question constantly, and the answer is no and yes. How's that for evasive? The short answer is that there are circumstances where an autographed card raises the value of that card, but the majority of the time, it can hurt that card's value. Let me explain each side thoroughly!
How an artist's autograph can hurt the value of a card:
Chalk this one up to experience. Once upon a time, a young Ben Bleiweiss was in charge of taking care of customer exchanges at this here StarCityGames.com. The most common complaint I received? Someone had ordered a Near Mint version of a card, but received a signed copy of that card, and didn't consider that card to be Near Mint. Often the person would not realize it was a signature (some artists have a pretty sloppy signature) and thought that their cards were just scribbled on.
I would explain that the writing was the artist's signature, and offer to exchange the card for a non-signed copy if the customer still didn't want a signed copy. More often than not, they would end up exchanging the card. We stopped selling signed cards through the website for a while, because the customer complaints were becoming more-than-weekly occurrences.
Eventually, we decided that artist-signed cards would start as Slightly Played condition cards; if the card was signed and Near Mint or Slightly Played, we classified it as Slightly Played. If it was signed and Heavily Played, we'd put it in our Heavily Played inventory, of course. This cleared up a ton of the customer issues, though to this day we still have some customers who are unhappy if they receive autographed cards, so we've yet to completely solve the problem.
But wait! Artists are popular! I've seen signed cards sell for more than non-signed copies of the same card. What gives?
It's true; Artists are a draw (pun intended) for any well-run event. If you put two identical events side-by-side, with the only difference being that one event has an artist in attendance and the other does not, the one with the artist will bring in more people. Exactly how many people I wouldn't really be able to say, but it's enough that it makes a slight difference.
It's also true that from time-to-time, signed versions of a card will be worth more than non-signed versions. However, this is not a rule, nor an exception; it's the golden rule of collectibles in general:
A collectible is worth as much or as little as someone is willing to pay for it.
This applies to almost anything in life, because a capitalist system is subject to the laws of supply and demand. There are factors absent in the price of a semi-rare collectible. For instance, the value of a car is partly determined by the cost to manufacture; the cost of the actual materials involved in physically making the car (metal, electronics, plastics, fabrics). Without factoring in labor costs (design, manufacture, advertising), a car should at least be worth the sum of its base components. A Magic card? Not so much - objectively, Black Lotus and Pearled Unicorn cost the same to manufacture, but obviously Supply and Demand (outside of the value of the physical materials used to construct a Black Lotus - paper, ink, a thin sheet of anti-counterfeiting metal in the center of the card) kick in, and Black Lotus has value.
There might be someone out there who is just dying, dying to get a signed copy of 9th Edition Sea's Claim. Who knows why? Maybe this person is putting together a signed set of 9th Edition and this is the last card they need to finish that set. Maybe the person likes artist Thomas Gianni and this is the last Thomas Gianni card missing from their collection. For whatever reason, this person has been looking and looking for that Gianni-signed 9th Edition Sea's Claim.
Let's say, for arguments sake, that we get an e-mail from this person, asking if we have a signed copy of 9th Edition Sea's Claim. Let's say, again for arguments sake, that we do in fact have this card.
So what is this card worth?
Well, to 99.9999% of Magic Players, I'd venture in the range of $0.01 to $0.10 - they'd view a 9th Edition Sea's Claim as a bulk common, and not a great one at that. If a particular player needed a Sea's Claim, they wouldn't particularly care if it were signed or not; in fact, more people are probably looking to put together NM sets of 9th who wouldn't want a signed Sea's Claim than those who want the card to actually play with.
But to this one person, mystery person X who so desperately wanted a signed Sea's Claim, it's worth a lot more than $0.10. What would I charge for this card? $1? $5? $10? Would they easily be able to obtain another signed copy of Sea's Claim in the future (maybe make a friend who would be at a Thomas Gianni-attended tournament?) If we were to carry random signed Commons that are unlikely to have an audience, would our processing costs (acquiring the card, sorting a bevy of autographed cards by set, alphabetizing them) give us justification for a higher price tag?
There isn't a hard-and-fast answer to this question, but the general answer would be the golden rule - this signed 9th Edition Sea's Claim is worth whatever this person wants to pay for it. If they felt that $5 would make them happy, great! If they felt like $1, sure, but remember; the lower the price, the less worth it is for us (as a business) to hold onto this type of card, and the less likely we'll have it when somebody is looking for it.
Are you saying that I shouldn't get my cards signed?
Generally, if you're concerned about the value of your cards above and beyond any other consideration, then no, you should not get your cards signed. You especially should not get your card signed if you're thinking about getting a card professionally graded, as this will significantly hurt the value of your card to other people.
The key here, though, is the value to other people. Getting an autographed signed is often an intensely personal experience; you travel to an event, you meet an artist, maybe swap a story or two, have some banter while your cards are getting signed. It's a happening; neither you nor the artist is an automation - you are both human beings living the human experience. The autograph, in this case, becomes a bond between you and that artist.
If you plan on keeping the card for yourself, then an autograph can be invaluable. It's hard to distinguish any one copy of a card from any other copy; the majority of Sarkhan Vols look just like every other Sarkhan Vol. Getting that Sarkhan Vol autographed, though, adds personal value to the card. You can show them off to your friends, and relive the experience of attending the event where you got the card signed, maybe bring up other memories associated with that signed card.
So yes, you should absolutely get your card signed! One of the main attractions of Magic is the social interaction. I never made much money playing on the Pro Tour. But despite the lack of a financial gain, the life experience I took away from being on the Tour, travelling the World, meeting people who will be with me the rest of my life; priceless.
As a quick aside before I conclude my article for this week - artist altered cards are an entirely different subject. These tend to pull in money beyond the baseline value of a card, when done well. However, most artists charge some sort of fee to alter cards on-site (or through the mail), so you are likely going to have to invest some money if you're looking to turn around an altered card for a profit. I'll be talking about artist-altered cards in the future column, but the topic bore mentioning since we're talking about artists and cards!
That's all the time I have for this week! Join me next week when I tackle a highly-controversial topic that is sure to bring a good amount of debate. Until then, may you live the life of Magic!
Ben Bleiweiss





Friday, January 9th - The creation of a stable manabase is often an overlooked art. Today, premier deckbuilder Stuart Wright takes us through some of the finer...
Friday, January 9th - Canadian maestro Rich Hoaen has downed tools for good, as work and real life intrudes apace. As a replacement, we have Luis Scott-Vargas, who shares each pick from a Magic Online 8-4 queue. He talks us...
Monday, January 12th - As we ease into the middle segment of the Onslaught/Odyssey territory, looking to rank the lesser-known cards...
Monday, January 12th - Slow Play is one of the most difficult calls for a Judge to make because of the subjectivity of the infraction. The truth of the matter is that Slow Play happens a lot more often than it gets penalized for....
Monday, January 12th - In this week's episode of the Magic Sock Podcast, there's discussion on the latest batch of Conflux rumors, some ideas for your casual...
Monday, January 12th - We’re striding through January, and the horizon holds a new set of cards… Conflux! Today, Patrick Chapin takes a look at ten...
Monday, January 12th - For a format with a relatively static cardpool, Vintage can mutate and evolve at a surprising rate. Today, Stephen Menendian brings us an...
Tuesday, January 13th - Is this game we play, somehow, art. And perhaps more relevantly - really, more to the root of why I want to write this article - are the...
Tuesday, January 13th - With unprecedented access to every sanctioned result across a decade of Magical excellence, Rich brings us the first of a new series... 
Thursday, January 8th - Hello everyone, and Happy 2009! It’s a pleasure to be back in the driver’s seat, writing for you all as we head on toward the third American Legacy Grand Prix, and hopefully I’ll provide you all a...
Thursday, January 8th - I was staying with my in-laws in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula over the New Year’s weekend. That’s snow country, and it snowed. ...
Thursday, January 8th - Red/White Reveillark, christened “Boat Brew,” has been a strong yet underappreciated Standard option for a few months now. With...
Friday, January 9th - Hello everybody, and welcome to the return of the Magic Show! This week we’re going through all of the footage shot in Memphis last month for the World Championships. Are you ready to talk about split...
Friday, January 9th - This week I’m pleased to present a very special interview with Wizards of the Coast’s Magic Director, Aaron Forsythe. When I heard he... 










