Note: This was originally published as StarCityGames.com Premium content - but like all StarCityGames.com Premium articles, it has been made freely available for the entire community after one month has passed. Join StarCityGames.com Premium today and gain exclusive access to the most informative Magic: the Gathering content available!
[SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE]
Become a StarCityGames.com Premium Member and receive exclusive access to top-level strategies, new decklists and entertaining reports from many of the best players and writers that the game has to offer! This includes "The Innovator" & Worlds finalist Patrick Chapin, Hall of Famer Olivier Ruel, Hall of Famer Antoine Ruel, Pro Tour Champion Brian Kibler, Grand Prix champion Manuel Bucher, Deckbuilder extraordinaire Adrian Sullivan, Vintage expert Stephen Menendian, Team USA member Sam Black, StarCityGames.com GM of Acquisitions Ben Bleiweiss ...and many, many more!
PLUS! StarCityGames.com Premium members now have unprecedented access into America's largest Magic: the Gathering sales database, and can view lists of StarCityGames.com's top-selling items - broken down by category, format legality, and rarity - in real time! When it comes to trading, increased knowledge equals increased profits - and increased knowledge is just one click away for our Premium members!
[View feedback from StarCityGames.com Premium members!]
A StarCityGames.com Premium Membership gives you exclusive access to the best Magic: the Gathering content available and is an amazing bargain for just pennies a day! When you're ready to start getting more out of this game, click here to join StarCityGames.com Premium today!
If you are a valid StarCityGames.com Premium member and still cannot view the article, please consult this FAQ.
I. The Metagame Breakdown by Archetype
There were fourteen tournaments in September and October with 33 players or more. These tournaments occurred across the globe, from the Netherlands to the Philippines, from Italy to the France. Links to the Top 8 data can be found in the Appendix.
That makes for a total of 112 Top 8 decklists (although 5 are missing).
Here’s what made Top 8 (placement in Top 8 in parenthesis):
12 TPS (1,1,1,2,2,3,4,7,7,7,8,8)
10 Fish (1,2,3,4,5,5,6,7,8,8)
10 MUD (1,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,7,8)
9 Oath (1,1,3,4,4,4,5,8,8)
8 Control Slaver (1,2,2,4,5,5,6,6)
7 (1,2,3,5,6,7,8)
6 Painter (3,3,4,6,7,8)
6 3c Control (1,2,6,6,7,8)
5 Drain Tendrils
5 Bomberman
5 Zoo
4 Tez Control (1 was mono-Blue, 3 multi-color)
3 Deez Naughts
3 Bob-Control (1)
2 Goblins
1 5c Stax
1 Mono-Blue Control
1 Tendrils Combo (1)
1 Suicide Black
1 2c Control
1 Sullivan Solution Variants
1 Landstill
1 Ad Nauseam (1)
1 Mono Red Workshop Aggro
1 Bomberman/Painter Hybrid (1)
1 Wizards
1 UR Stax
II. Breakdown by Archetype As Percentage of Total
TPS (10.7% of Top 8s)
Fish (8.9%)
MUD (8.9%)
Oath (8%)
Control Slaver (7.1%)
(6.25%)
Painter (5.35%)
3c Control (5.35%)
Rest of the Metagame: 39.45%
Only one archetype made up more than 10% of the Vintage metagame. This is a pretty healthy Vintage format! Many decks are viable and the format appears strategically varied and diverse.
III. Analysis
TPS, Fish, and MUD are the best performing decks, although a host of decks are making Top 8, just in different archetypes. More on that later.
In the last metagame breakdown, the top performing decks were Control Slaver followed by MUD, TPS, and Fish. Control Slaver has fallen a bit, but the rest of the metagame looks quite similar.
TPS is, appropriately, the best performing deck in Vintage. I was surprised to see that a bunch of U.S.-style TPS decks (which are really just 2004 European style TPS decks) doing well in Europe in the month of September. The remainder of the TPS decks were really Bob-TPS decks, which exclusively placed in Europe. I counted this major variant under the header "TPS," although it could easily have deserved its own archetype label.
Given the dominance of decks in the metagame, it should not be surprising that based storm decks are an excellent choice for the skilled Vintage pilot. As players become more competent with Storm combo, and as they discover what a wonderful archetype it is to master, I hope/think this trend will persist. TPS provides a great foil for the emergent Tezzeret control decks.
brought with it the a two-turn clock in Oath, an objective Meandeck Oath, with Akroma and , was never able to achieve without the opponent helping out. But pairing Overlord Hellkite with Akroma makes for 20 damage in two turns. Oddly, only about half of the nine placing Oath decks were running .
MUD is still one of the top performers in the format. The decks I lumped under MUD, although all heavy artifact and Workshop based, were in some cases very different. I did not count decks with a five-color or multi-color manabase.
The Fish decks were just as varied. Some were GWS’s BUG Fish. Others were UBW Fish. One was mono-Blue. I lumped them all together here. Painter is still managing to put up numbers, and is a viable metagame player.
is still the quiet Thunder in the format. Ichorid won the largest tournament of this dataset, the massive 315 player tournament in Milan that Chapin and Dave Williams competed in. I will admit, this proves that Ichorid can win a major tournament in Vintage.
IV. Ch-ch-changes
There were a lot of changes during this data period. The entrance of Shards of Alara immediately impacted the format. The restoration of also changed things up a lot. But so did the five unrestrictions. All this is only a few months after the whole metagame was changed by a wave of restrictions. I think the next dataset will be very revealing as to what, precisely, is the role of Tezzeret, and whether cards like Ad Nauseam will be more than bit players.
V. Top 8 Metagame Breakdown by Engine
46 Decks (41% of Top 8s)
14 Decks (12.5%)
13 Mishra’s Workshop Decks (11.6%)
11 (estimate) Decks (9.8%)
7 Bazaar Decks (6.25%)
Other (18.85%)
From this view of the metagame, things are not so rosy. Mana Drain decks are totally dominant. Half of the Oath decks switched from running Mana Drain to the faster, and more efficient, . Otherwise their numbers would have been even higher. But Bomberman, Control Slaver, Painter, Drain Tendrils, Tezzeret control, and the various other control decks all ran Mana Drains. This is, by far, the largest chunk of the metagame. Not all of the Fish decks ran , but these R/G base Zoo decks all did. Keep in mind that 5 decks were missing from this dataset.
In the previous dataset:
Mana Drain decks (36.5% of the metagame)
Workshop deck (15.5%)
decks (15.5%)
decks (13%)
Bazaar decks (10%)
Other Decks (10%)
From an engine perspective, the format is pretty similar to the previous dataset. Workshops declined slightly, Null Rod decks increased by a commensurate amount, Bazaar decks declined slightly, and Mana Drain decks increased by the same amount. In short, it’s pretty much the same thing as last time, but with a 5% variance for each engine type.
VI. Notable Decks
The first deck that caught my attention was this European Control deck.
If I had just seen one of these decks, I wouldn’t have taken much notice. However, this deck was a strong performer, making up over 5% of the archetypes.
This deck looks like a blast to play. It also looks difficult to play properly. The draw engine isn’t particularly strong, and this deck probably wins on the back of cumulative card advantage most of the time. Tiny advantages, tight play; those are the keys to success here. For those of you who love Control decks, I would give this a spin.
The second deck I want to highlight here is an Ad Nauseam Storm deck that won a 61-man tournament in Italy:
A couple of weeks ago, I published what I believed was that proper utilization of Ad Nauseam in Vintage.
This deck utilizes many of those suggestions, although its composition is very different. The pilot only ran 2 , and 3 over , but it did run 4 bounce spells, as I did. Most importantly, it’s good to know that Ad Nauseam is a real deck. It is no small feat to win a 61 person tournament with a brand new deck.
The final deck I wanted to bring to your attention is this Storm combo variant:
This deck won a 36 person tournament. The first and most important feature of this Dark Ritual deck is that it has four . Second, to support four , it has a few more lands and plenty of to make it resolve. This deck has no Yawgmoth’s , which I find somewhat surprising. Still, it’s a creative and tournament-tested shell for a nice Storm combo variant.
VII. Possible Unrestrictions
The DCI has done a fantastic job with its most recent unrestrictions. I was a little bit nervous about , which I would not have unrestricted. Although it has found a solid home in Ad Nauseam, it appears that Ad Nauseam, as powerful as it is, is simply not better than TPS. Belcher pilots have now cut all land in favor of more . Thus, although it is seeing play (which is why I wouldn’t have unrestricted it), for the moment, Chrome Mox has not been a problem. However, it and have both opened the door to other decks and new budget options. , in my opinion, makes Parfait a very nice option for Vintage. In the near future, I should explore what other budget options are now possible thanks to the unrestriction of these cards.
In the meantime, it is my view that Wizards should complete the cycle. There is absolutely no reason for the restriction of . I comprehensively addressed this question in an earlier article.
VIII. Conclusion
Once again, it is a great time to play Vintage. There are many viable deck options from Ichorid to Oath. The format is anchored by Mana Drain decks, which allows players position themselves within a relatively well defined tactical landscape. Whatever your taste, there is something for you in current Vintage. Because of Shards and the unrestrictions, there are also many options which haven’t quite played out yet. Vintage is exciting and dynamic.
Until next time…
Stephen Menendian
APPENDIX
9.06
1) Cedarburg, Wisconsin
48 people
9.07
2) Milan Italy
315 people
9.13.
3) Coshocton, PA
44 people
(5-8 missing)
9.14
4) Rome, Italy
61 people
5) Manila, Philippines
52 people
9.20
6) Badalona, Spain
70 people
9.21
7) Annecy, France
150 people
10.5
8) L’Aquila, Italy
51 people
10.11
9) Barcelona, Spain
47 people
10.12
10) Breda, Netherlands
50 people
10.19
11) Milano, Italy
61 people
12) Albacete, Spain
35 players
10.20
13) Manila, Philippines
33 people
10.25
14) Badalona, Spain
70 people
| 
